ic Overview of the Threat Construct
Blue
Paradig
m
Blue
Target
Profile
Heavy Forces
Rapid Reinforcement
Propositioned Stocks
Strong Alliance
Nuclear Deterrence
Fixed Targets
Massed-Formati
Logistical Sites
Centralized C2
Terrestrial Comm
Entry Operations
Buildup of Capability
Air/Missile Campaign
Ground/Air Campaign
Transition
Operations
Air and Sea PODs
Forward Bases
LOC's & Log
Stockpiles
Long haul C2
Technical ISR
Alliance and
Coalitions Homelai
Public Support
Will to fight
Cold War
1980
Forward Deployed
Red
Strate
gy
Red
Capabilit
y
77 ?
V> J
Expand Alliance
Arms Race
Overwhelm Defenses
Nuclea’r Deterrence
ADA Supports
Maneuver
Strategic Strike
Global Ai’i 9 & Navy
Echeloned Ground Forces
etc. ....
Forward Presence
:er US & NATO
n m
r
Local/Regional Dominance
Deny Extra Regional Access
Force Preservation/ Regime
Survival
Undermine Alliances &
Coalitions
J
nun
Leverage Technology
£onvenfional & Unconventional
Forces
TBM's, Cruise Missiles
Air & Missile Defenses
Information Operations
Denial & Deception
OLD PARADIGM
Defensive Counterattack
Offensive
xxx
Rear Area Security
Roles
•Deep Operations
•Close Air Support
•Lift/Air Assault
•C2
Conditions
•Linear Battlefield
•Rear Areas (Sanctuary)
•Massed Formations
•Defensive ADA
•Area Lethal SEAD possible
Threats
•Air/Missile Attacks to
Airfields
•SOF Attacks/WME
•Artillery/Rocket Attack to
FARP
•IAD- Protecting Targets
and
Along Routes
•EW- Jamming Corns,
Radars
and GPS
•EMP
•Conventional, Non-Air
NEW PARADIGM
Offensive
Defensive
Recon Fires Complex
Recon Strike Complex
Military Systemology
Roles
•Deep Operations
•Close Air Support
•Lift/Air Assault
•C2
Conditions
•Non-Linear Battlefield
•No Rear Areas
(No Sanctuary)
•Offensive ADA
•Dispersed Targets
•Expanded ISR
•Precision SEAD
Required
Threats
•Air/Missile Attacks
•WME
•Direct Fires
•SOF
•Artillery/Rocket
Attacks
•Passive Sensors
•EW- Jamming Corns,
Radars and GPS
•EMP
Cell/GPS Comms
-
reat Air Defense
UAV/ GPS jamming
Multi-spectral Systems
Missiles
Deception -Ra<|io Net \ EarlyJA/arning
AN PAD!
Command
Centi
Fusion Center
GPS Jamming
Armed Reconnaissance Role
Al
iws Commander
Unimpeded
Rapid Movement
hout Battle:
/ \
/ \
uav/ GPS Jamming
Threat Air Defense Ambus
Early Warning
Anti-Helicopter MinesDeception -Radio Net
Gain Informatii
Superiority
and SA
eny Enemy l
/ \
UAV/ jGPSjafn iti i ng
/
/
/
/
/
Early Warning
MAN PADS
— —
L^frectton Findii
Decoys
Early Warning- HUMINT/SPF
Deception -Radio Net
le
ximizes CClS,
Minimal Time
to React,
ses IAD
Deep Attack Role
m
UAV/ GPS Jamming
Threat Air Defense System Protec
Early Warning
MAN PADS
T
Early Warning- HUMINT/S
Anti-Helicopter MinesDeception -Radio Net
General Air Defense Trends (U)
WHY IT'S CHANGING
igh
Multi Function Missile Systdrm
ADA/SAM MIX
L
Millimeter Wave Radars P
Multi-spectral
Sensors
Improved Munitions
TODAY 2000 201!>
Applying Lessons L
Adoptive and Ad
*
Emerging
Today -Tomorrow
Emerging S
Multi-spectral sensor integr
NOE/OTH Radar capability
Integration of gun and missilBedundant C3I
Advanced munitions
Enhanced targeting
Dispersed, Integrated,
and Decentralized
engagement
Mixed automated and
manual tracking-- win war
of weather
Maximum use of complex
terrain
EVOLUTION CHARACTERIZED BY CHANGE IN THE
TARGET SET
Non Traditional Air
Defense Employment ...
Air Defense Ambush
AD Missile Trends
• Dual Mode S&sker
• SzjIv&s
• Multi-missile Guidance
Capability
• Target Priority TBM, Cruise
Missile and MmmK
• Increased Range
Strategies
Mobility
Target C2ISR
Increase Bins Air Stand-off
Ctmlse Missile Threat
Tactical System Trends
• Networked Systems
• Airburst Munitions
• Advanced Signet
Processing
improved dirtier
Processing
Target Recognition
• Combination ADA/SAM
Systems
• Sensor is^tegmilen
Radar/EO
Passive Interce pt
Point "forget Defense
Air Defense Ambush
Met Tied to Troops
All Weather Targeting
C: Wpns Trends
AD Radar Trends
• Millimeter Wmve
Reduce Ground " Clutter "
Hover detection
• Phased Array
•Low Probability Of
Intercept
Low peak power
Frequency Modulated
High Operating Frequency
• Advanced Sign®!
Processing
ompllmentary System
Redundant
Sensor Fusion
MAN PADS Trends
• Improved Radar mnd
Infrared Guidance
•din pro wad Seekers
• Increased range
•All Aspect ongsjgofnonit
Capability
Mistral
Source: U.S. Army
K
Stinger
• Increased Countermeasure
Czj pability
Strategies
Offensive
Ambush
UAV - Trends
Attack UAV
• TARGETS gg^ggEB
• AIR DEFENSE RADARS
• ARMOR
• C2
• PASSIVE SENSORS
• IR
• RF SEEKERS
• ACOUSTIC
• SMALL WARHEADS
• HE - POSSIBLE CHEMICAL
• FRAG
- POSSIBLE BIOLOGICAL
40 + countries developing/using U/ Vs
Difficult to detect , track, and destr ly
UAVs are proven force multipliers
Strategies
Reduce Air Force Requireme
Near Real Time Intelligence
Degrade Digitized Battlefield
Preserve Force
Electronic Warfare UAV
Dedicated Com ms Jammer
Aircraft Trends
• ff9e#»s?s®«! US’S
Of PGMs/Crulse Missiles
• increased Stand-off
Range
• Reduced Radar Cross
Section
• Increased Aircraft
Survivability
• Increased Multi-role
Variants
Strategies
Regional Dominance
Potential Air Threat
Survivability vs Attack
AIRCRAFT CAN STILL REPRESENT A LETHAL THREAT.
Helicopter Trends
• Increased Stand-off
Range
• Improved Accuracy
• Better Might & Adverse
Weath er Capability
• Improved Aircraft
Survivability Systems
• Improved IR Signature
Reduction Technology
Strategies
Reconnaissance
Limited Attack w/ Conditions
[tack Helicopters Are A Dangerous Threat To T
Maneuver Force
Aviation Implications
Aviation Operational Environment Highlights:
■ a wider spectrum of operations, increased threat
technological capability and unpredictability leading
to a more complex and challenging range of operating
environments . .
"In association with an Adaptive and Adoptive Threat
* A Challenge for Independent Maneuver
* Suggests Combined Arms operations
* Extremely lethal, offensively oriented air defense
environment
* Degradation of U.S. technological superiority
* Changed target sets
* Challenges US preferred method of
Warfare.... Standoff, Precision